Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 26.3 MB/s Around 2163.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 946 More than 3x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.66 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 3 years later
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 1.79 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.77 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.37 pt/$ More than 40% better performance per dollar
Better PassMark score 1,863 vs 654 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.67 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D510

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D510

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom D510 vs the Celeron J1900.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom D510

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D510
1,001

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom D510
26.3 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Atom D510
1,260

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Atom D510
2,024

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom D510 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.66 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR2-800
DDR2-667
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom D510 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.77 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.77 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 13W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 1.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 10.56W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom D510
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus