Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Celeron J1900
Front view of Intel Atom D2700

Intel Atom D2700

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 33.3 MB/s Around 1708.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 1,241 More than 2.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 640 MHz Around 10% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Sep, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 2.89 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
Slightly better PassMark score 1,863 vs 839 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D2700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2700

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Slightly better performance per dollar 0.56 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 5% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom D2700

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
2,927
Atom D2700
1,212

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
924
Atom D2700
485

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom D2700
33.3 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
2,887
Atom D2700
1,241

GeekBench

Celeron J1900
2,887
Atom D2700
1,241

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron J1900
1,863
Atom D2700
839

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron J1900
534
Atom D2700
350

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron J1900  vs
Atom D2700 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 640 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

 Celeron J1900  vs
Atom D2700 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.13 GHz

power consumption
TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 2.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus
Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2700
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss