0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom D2700 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s | ![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released September, 2011
Intel Atom D2700
- 2.13 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom D2700
![]() | Slightly higher clock speed 2.13 GHz | ![]() | Slightly better performance per dollar 0.56 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron J1900CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 56,900 MB/s | vs | 33.3 MB/s | Around 1708.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,887 | vs | 1,241 | More than 2.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 640 MHz | Around 10% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2011 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Better performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | vs | 2.89 pt/W | Around 50% better performance per watt | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 1,863 | vs | 839 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 2.13 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Slightly better performance per dollar | 0.56 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | More than 5% better performance per dollar |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom D2700
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
2,927
Atom D2700
1,212
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
924
Atom D2700
485
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom D2700
33.3 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
2,887
Atom D2700
1,241
GeekBench
Celeron J1900
2,887
Atom D2700
1,241
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron J1900
1,863
Atom D2700
839
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron J1900
534
Atom D2700
350
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom D2700 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Integrated | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 640 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 8,533.33 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 4,096 MB |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom D2700 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | 2.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() | Intel Atom D2700 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $125 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $107 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs N3150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $94 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J3455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1007U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||