Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 29.2 MB/s Around 1948.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 738 Around 4x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 70% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 2.16 pt/W Around 2x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 1,863 vs 406 More than 4.5x better PassMark score
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Sep, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D2500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom D2500 vs the Celeron J1900.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom D2500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom D2500
29.2 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom D2500 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom D2500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 2.16 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus