Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom C2308 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
 | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom C2308
- 1.25 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2308
| | Newer Apr, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | 60% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date 6 months later | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Celeron J1900 vs Atom C2308
clock speed
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom C2308 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB | |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom C2308 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron J1900  Report a correction |  Intel Atom C2308 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $82 | |
| 3220 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $82 | |
| N3150 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $82 | |
| J1800 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $82 | |
| 1037U vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $94 | $82 | |
| J2900 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | ||
| J3455 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $82 | |
| 1007U vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
