0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom C2308 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom C2308
- 1.25 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2308
![]() | Newer Apr, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | 60% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date 6 months later |
Features Key features of the Celeron J1900 vs Atom C2308
clock speed
Celeron J1900
2 GHz
Atom C2308
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz
Atom C2308
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz
Atom C2308
1.25 GHz
TDP
Celeron J1900
10W
Atom C2308
6W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom C2308 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom C2308 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 6W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() | Intel Atom C2308 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
3220 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $82 | |
N3150 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $82 | |
J2900 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $82 | |
J1800 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1037U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J3455 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1007U vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||