0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs 3855U |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz |
VS
Released October, 2015
Intel 3855U
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 3855U
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,758 |
![]() | More number of displays supported 3 | ![]() | Better performance per dollar 0.72 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,758 | vs | 924 | More than 90% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Better performance per dollar | 0.72 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | Around 40% better performance per dollar | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 854 MHz | More than 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Better performance per watt | 5.17 pt/W | vs | 4.27 pt/W | More than 20% better performance per watt |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs 3855U
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
2,927
3855U
2,869
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
924
3855U
1,758
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
3855U
2,220 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron J1900
1,863
3855U
1,715
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron J1900
534
3855U
906
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | 3855U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 300 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | 900 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3 | |||
LPDDR3-1600 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | 3855U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | 5.17 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() | Intel 3855U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron N3150 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
Intel J3455 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron 1037U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $82 | |
Intel Pentium J2900 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron 1007U vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||