Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900
Front view of Intel 3855U

Intel 3855U

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel 3855U

Reasons to consider the
Intel 3855U

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,758 vs 924 More than 90% better geekbench 3 single core score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better performance per dollar 0.72 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 40% better performance per dollar
Better turbo clock speed 900 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 5% better turbo clock speed
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 5.17 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 20% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs 3855U

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
2,927
3855U
2,869

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
924
3855U
1,758

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
3855U
2,220 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron J1900
1,863
3855U
1,715

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron J1900
534
3855U
906

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron J1900  vs
3855U 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 510
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 900 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3
LPDDR3-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

 Celeron J1900  vs
3855U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.6 GHz

power consumption
TDP 10W 15W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 5.17 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 12.19W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel 3855U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss