Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Mar, 2005 Release date over 8 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 19.5W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 1.61 pt/W Around 2.8x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better PassMark score 1,863 vs 426 More than 4.2x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 5.78 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 21.02 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32 vs the Intel Celeron J1900.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Turion 64 technology MT-32

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-32 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 24W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 5.78 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 21.02 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 1.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 19.5W

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-32 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.13 GHz
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus