Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.42 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 450 MHz Around 55% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,927 vs 2,278 Around 30% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E2 3800

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3800

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 654,900 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s More than 11.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better performance per watt 18 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 4.2x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs E2 3800

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 3800
2,278

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
E2 3800
654,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 3800
2,186

GeekBench

E2 3800
2,186

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E2 3800
1,614

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
E2 3800 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz None
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8280
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 450 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Celeron J1900  vs
E2 3800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.3 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 15W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 18 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 12.19W
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD E2 3800
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus