Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.42 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.35 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 95% higher GPU clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.35 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly better PassMark score 1,863 vs 841 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.35 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD E1 6010

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 6010

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 664,400 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s Around 11.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better performance per watt 25.98 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 6x better performance per watt
Newer Apr, 2014 vs Oct, 2013 Release date 6 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs E1 6010

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 6010
1,248

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
E1 6010
664,400 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
E1 6010 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.35 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz None
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon R2 series
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 350 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333

details

Celeron J1900  vs
E1 6010 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.35 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.35 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.35 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 25.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD E1 6010
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus