Intel Celeron J1900 vs AMD E 350

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Celeron J1900 5.2 E 350 4.9 Core i3 3220 5.7
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Celeron J1900 6.5 E 350 6.3 Core i3 3220 8.7
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Celeron J1900 n.d. E 350 n.d. Core i3 3220 n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Celeron J1900 2.9 E 350 4.3 Core i3 3220 4.5
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Celeron J1900 7.4 E 350 6.5 Core i3 3220 5.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Celeron J1900 n.d. E 350 n.d. Core i3 3220 n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.4	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Celeron J1900 6.2 E 350 6.4 Core i3 3220 6.9

Winner
AMD E 350

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E 350 based on its features.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Celeron J1900

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Front view of AMD E 350

AMD E 350

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron J1900 vs the AMD E 350.

Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E 350 vs the Intel Celeron J1900.

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

1.78 mHash/s

7.51 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

36.45 fps

50.77 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

-1 fps

0.1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,927

1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

924

620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

56,900 MB/s

51,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

1,863

782

PassMark (Single Core)

534

420

summary	Celeron J1900	vs	E 350
Clock speed	2 GHz		1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed	2.42 GHz		None
Cores	Quad core		Dual core
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU		GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics		Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed	688 MHz		492 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details	Celeron J1900	vs	E 350
Threads	4		2
L2 cache	2 MB		1 MB
L2 cache per core	0.5 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	22 nm		40 nm
Max CPUs	1		1
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	2.42 GHz		3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	2.42 GHz		3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	2.42 GHz		3.5 GHz
power consumption
TDP	10W		18W
Performance per watt	4.27 pt/W		1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption	8.13W		30.2W

Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction

AMD E 350

Report a correction

VS

Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900

VS

Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD E 350

Comments

comments powered by Disqus