CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD E 350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E 350  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron J1900 vs the AMD E 350.

Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E 350 vs the Intel Celeron J1900.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs E 350

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
E 350
7.51 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
36.45 fps
E 350
50.77 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
E 350
0.1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz None
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Celeron J1900  vs
E 350 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 3.5 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 18W
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 30.2W
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus