Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs 0 GHz Compared to all cpus, 2.42 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 20.31W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 15% higher GPU clock speed
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 6.02 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 21.9 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5370

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5370

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Celeron J1900  vs Athlon Athlon™ 5370 

clock speed

turbo clock speed

gpu clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Athlon Athlon™ 5370 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz 0 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 25W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 21.9 $/year
Typical power consumption 8.13W 20.31W

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Athlon Athlon™ 5370 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ R3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 600 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5370
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus