CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs 5150 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 819.5 MB/s Around 69.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 20.31W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 15% higher GPU clock speed
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 6.02 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 21.9 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 5150

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 5150

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.37 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s Around 11.2x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Newer Dec, 2013 vs Oct, 2013 Release date 2 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Athlon 5150

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
Athlon 5150
15.54 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s
Athlon 5150
4.37 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
36.45 fps
Athlon 5150
99.17 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
Athlon 5150
0.36 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Athlon 5150
819.5 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Athlon 5150 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 25W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 3.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 20.31W

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Athlon 5150 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8400
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 600 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 5150
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus