Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 70% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Dec, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 3.11 pt/W More than 35% better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A6 3420M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3420M

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 76,600 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s Around 35% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 2.63 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s Around 6.8x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.62 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs A6 3420M

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
A6 3420M
23.72 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s
A6 3420M
2.63 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
A6 3420M
0.25 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 3420M
3,126

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
A6 3420M
76,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A6 3420M
2,020

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
A6 3420M 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6520G
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3

details

Celeron J1900  vs
A6 3420M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.62 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.62 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 3.11 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD A6 3420M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus