CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs 5000 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD A4 5000 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A4 5000  based on its single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A4 5000

AMD A4 5000

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs 0 GHz Compared to all cpus, 2.42 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.55 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD A4 5000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5000

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 752,800 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s Around 13.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 2.9 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s Around 7.5x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Much better performance per watt 13.97 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Oct, 2013 Release date 4 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs A4 5000

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
A4 5000
16.17 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s
A4 5000
2.9 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
A4 5000
0.41 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 5000
2,562

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
A4 5000
752,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A4 5000
1,898

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
A4 5000 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.55 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz 0 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 13.5W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 11.83 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 13.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 10.97W

details

Celeron J1900  vs
A4 5000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8330

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
AMD A4 5000
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus