0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs AMD A4 1350 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz |
![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
VS
Released September, 2013
AMD A4 1350
- 1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD A4 1350
![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 6.5W | ![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 7.01 $/year |
![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 2.42 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2.42 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1 GHz | 2x higher clock speed | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| |||||||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 6.5W | vs | 8.13W | 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 7.01 $/year | vs | 8.76 $/year | 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 1.93 $/year | vs | 2.41 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost |
Features Key features of the Celeron J1900 vs A4 1350
clock speed
Celeron J1900
2 GHz
A4 1350
1 GHz
L2 cache
Celeron J1900
2 MB
A4 1350
2 MB
gpu clock speed
Celeron J1900
688 MHz
A4 1350
300 MHz
TDP
Celeron J1900
10W
A4 1350
8W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | A4 1350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.42 GHz | None | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 8W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 1.93 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 7.01 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 6.5W |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | A4 1350 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon HD 8210 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 300 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 8,533.33 MB/s |
Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() | AMD A4 1350 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $125 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $107 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs N3150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J3455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $94 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J3160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1037U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||