Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1850

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1850

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the J1800 vs the J1850.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1850 vs J1800

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1850  vs
J1800 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.41 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron J1850  vs
J1800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 5.8 pt/W 3.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1850
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus