Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1850

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1850

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 95% higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 13.81W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per watt 5.8 pt/W vs 5.02 pt/W More than 15% better performance per watt
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 5 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 4.1 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 14.89 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 792 MHz More than 25% better turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 1.14 pt/$ vs 0.71 pt/$ More than 60% better performance per dollar
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better PassMark (Single core) score 952 vs 446 Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1850 vs 1037U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1850  vs
1037U 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Celeron J1850  vs
1037U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 1.8 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 17W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 5.8 pt/W 5.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1850
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus