CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1800 vs G1840 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1800 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1800  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 43.06W 5.3x lower typical power consumption
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 12.77 $/year 5.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 46.43 $/year 5.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1840

Report a correction
Supports more RAM 32,768 MB vs 8,192 MB Supports 4x more RAM
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs G1840

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s
Celeron G1840
8.62 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1800
-1 fps
Celeron G1840
111.31 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Celeron G1840
160,400 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
G1840 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 10W 53W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 12.77 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 46.43 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 2.75 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 43.06W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron J1800  vs
G1840 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1840
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus