Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Celeron 220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 220

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 220 vs the J1800.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs 220

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Celeron 220
48.3 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
220 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 688 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron J1800  vs
220 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.48 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 19W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 4.58 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 16.64 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 1.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 15.44W
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 220
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus