Winner
Intel Celeron 1037U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 1037U based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Celeron J1800 vs 1037U |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz | ![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.01 mPixels/s | ![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.14 pt/$ | ![]() | More number of displays supported 3 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 95% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 13.81W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2013 | Release date 8 months later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 4.1 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 14.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 4.01 mPixels/s | vs | 1.15 mPixels/s | Around 3.5x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 792 MHz | More than 25% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.14 pt/$ | vs | 0.55 pt/$ | More than 2x better performance per dollar | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,468 | vs | 964 | More than 50% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better performance per watt | 5.02 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | More than 25% better performance per watt |
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | 1037U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 792 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | 1037U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 5.02 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron J1800 ![]() | Intel Celeron 1037U ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron N3050 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $72 | |
Intel Core i3 2100 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||