0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1800 vs 1037U |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1800
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz | ![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1037U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 1037U
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.01 mPixels/s | ![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.14 pt/$ | ![]() | More number of displays supported 3 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 95% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 13.81W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2013 | Release date 8 months later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 4.1 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 14.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 4.01 mPixels/s | vs | 1.15 mPixels/s | Around 3.5x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 792 MHz | More than 25% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.14 pt/$ | vs | 0.55 pt/$ | More than 2x better performance per dollar | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,468 | vs | 964 | More than 50% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better performance per watt | 5.02 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | More than 25% better performance per watt |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs 1037U
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s
Celeron 1037U
4.01 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron J1800
-1 fps
Celeron 1037U
79.08 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
1,661
Celeron 1037U
2,571
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
964
Celeron 1037U
1,468
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron J1800
1,028
Celeron 1037U
1,733
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron J1800
554
Celeron 1037U
952
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | 1037U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 792 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | 1037U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 5.02 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron J1800 ![]() | Intel Celeron 1037U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron N3050 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $72 | |
Intel Pentium J2900 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $75 | |
Intel Atom D2550 vs Celeron 1037U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||