Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Intel Atom E3845

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.91 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 542 MHz More than 25% higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 1.92 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.91 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3845

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 317,450 MB/s vs 60.6 MB/s Around 5238.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per dollar 2.19 pt/$ vs 0.55 pt/$ Around 4x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 11.4 pt/W vs 3.97 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 31.24 fps vs -1 fps Around 3225% better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs Atom E3845

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s
Atom E3845
1.12 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1800
-1 fps
Atom E3845
31.24 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Atom E3845
317,450 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom E3845 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.91 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 542 MHz
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom E3845 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.92 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.91 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.92 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 11.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3845
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus