Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1800

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jun, 2010 Release date over 3 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 2.12 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,661 vs 1,038 More than 60% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better performance per watt 3.97 pt/W vs 2.62 pt/W More than 50% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D525

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D525

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 28,100 MB/s vs 60.6 MB/s Around 463.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs Atom D525

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
1,038

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Atom D525
28,100 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D525 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3-800
DDR2-800
DDR2-667
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D525 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 2.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 2.12 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 13W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 2.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 10.56W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
Intel Atom D525
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus