Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.66 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 1.77 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 3 years later
Better performance per watt 3.97 pt/W vs 1.79 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 554 vs 264 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per dollar 0.55 pt/$ vs 0.37 pt/$ Around 50% better performance per dollar
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,661 vs 1,001 More than 65% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.67 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D510

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D510

Report a correction
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs Atom D510

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D510
1,001

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Atom D510
26.3 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Atom D510
2,024

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D510 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.66 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR2-800
DDR2-667
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D510 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.77 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.77 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 13W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 1.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 10.56W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
Intel Atom D510
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus