Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1800

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.86 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 640 MHz Around 10% higher GPU clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,661 vs 1,147 Around 45% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D2550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2550

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 29,700 MB/s vs 60.6 MB/s More than 490x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Better performance per dollar 0.76 pt/$ vs 0.55 pt/$ Around 40% better performance per dollar
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs Atom D2550

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Atom D2550
29,700 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D2550 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 640 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D2550 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.87 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 3.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2550
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus