Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1800

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Celeron J1800
Front view of Intel Atom D2500

Intel Atom D2500

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.86 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 70% higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 554 vs 290 More than 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,661 vs 818 More than 2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better performance per watt 3.97 pt/W vs 2.16 pt/W Around 85% better performance per watt
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Sep, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D2500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom D2500 vs the Celeron J1800.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs Atom D2500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
1,661
Atom D2500
818

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
964
Atom D2500
479

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Atom D2500
29.2 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron J1800
1,028
Atom D2500
406

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron J1800
554
Atom D2500
290

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D2500 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

 Celeron J1800  vs
Atom D2500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.87 GHz

power consumption
TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 2.16 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus
Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss