Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650 vs the Intel Celeron J1800.

Features Key features of the Celeron J1800  vs Sempron Sempron™ 2650 

clock speed

turbo clock speed

gpu clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Sempron Sempron™ 2650 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.45 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz 0 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 25W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 21.9 $/year
Typical power consumption 8.13W 20.31W

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Sempron Sempron™ 2650 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ R3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus