CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1800 vs 2650 among desktop CPUs (up to 45W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1800 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1800  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 128 MHz Around 5.5x higher GPU clock speed
Front view of AMD Sempron 2650

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2650

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Sempron 2650 vs the Intel Celeron J1800.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs Sempron 2650

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s
Sempron 2650
3.72 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1800
-1 fps
Sempron 2650
84.31 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Sempron 2650
732,100 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Sempron 2650 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz None
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 25W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 9.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 20.31W

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Sempron 2650 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8240
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 128 MHz
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 10,666.66 MB/s
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 2650
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus