Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 85.31W 10.5x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 4 years later
Better performance per watt 3.97 pt/W vs 1.38 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 25.29 $/year 10.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 91.98 $/year 10.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2386 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2386 SE

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.41 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 3,538 vs 1,028 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 2.58 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2.58 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs Opteron 2386 SE

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Opteron 2386 SE 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 688 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz N/A

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Opteron 2386 SE 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 2

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 2.8 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 105W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 25.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 91.98 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 1.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 85.31W
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2386 SE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus