Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1800

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 450 MHz Around 55% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E2 3800

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3800

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 654,900 MB/s vs 60.6 MB/s Around 10807x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 18 pt/W vs 3.97 pt/W More than 4.5x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs E2 3800

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 3800
2,278

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
E2 3800
654,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E2 3800
1,614

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
E2 3800 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz None
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8280
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 450 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Celeron J1800  vs
E2 3800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.3 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 15W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 18 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 12.19W
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
AMD E2 3800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus