Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD E2 3000 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1800
 | Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz | | Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz |
| | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
VS
Released May, 2013
AMD E2 3000
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E2 3000
| | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 811,100 MB/s | | Much better performance per watt 21 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 450 MHz | Around 55% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 1,661 | vs | 1,063 | More than 55% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | May, 2013 | Release date 5 months later | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 811,100 MB/s | vs | 60.6 MB/s | Around 13384.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 21 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | More than 5.2x better performance per watt | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs E2 3000
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | E2 3000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | None | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon™ HD 8280 | |
| GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 450 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | E2 3000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 21 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W | |
 Intel Celeron J1800  Report a correction |  AMD E2 3000 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $72 | |
| J1900 vs J1800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $72 | |
| 3220 vs J1800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | ||
| J3355 vs J1800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $72 | |
| 1037U vs J1800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $72 | |
| N3050 vs J1800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | ||
| J3060 vs J1800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $145 | $72 | |
| E8400 vs J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
