0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD E2 3000 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1800
![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
VS
Released May, 2013
AMD E2 3000
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E2 3000
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 811,100 MB/s | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 21 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 450 MHz | Around 55% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 1,661 | vs | 1,063 | More than 55% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | May, 2013 | Release date 5 months later | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 811,100 MB/s | vs | 60.6 MB/s | Around 13384.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 21 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | More than 5.2x better performance per watt |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs E2 3000
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
1,661
E2 3000
1,063
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
964
E2 3000
816
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
E2 3000
811,100 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron J1800
1,028
E2 3000
1,080
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron J1800
554
E2 3000
634
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | E2 3000 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | None | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon™ HD 8280 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 450 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 |
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | E2 3000 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 21 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W |
Intel Celeron J1800 ![]() | AMD E2 3000 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
3220 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
J3355 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $72 | |
1037U vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $72 | |
N3050 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
J3060 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $72 | |
E8400 vs J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||