Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1800

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.65 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 450 MHz Around 55% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 1.65 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,661 vs 1,063 More than 55% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.65 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2013 vs May, 2013 Release date 5 months later
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E2 3000

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3000

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 811,100 MB/s vs 60.6 MB/s Around 13384.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better performance per watt 21 pt/W vs 3.97 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs E2 3000

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 3000
1,063

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
E2 3000
811,100 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E2 3000
1,080

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
E2 3000 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.65 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz None
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 8280
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 450 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3

details

Celeron J1800  vs
E2 3000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.65 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 15W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 21 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 12.19W
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
AMD E2 3000
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus