0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD E1 6010 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1800
![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz |
![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
VS
Released April, 2014
AMD E1 6010
- 1.35 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 6010
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 664,400 MB/s | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 25.98 pt/W |
![]() | Newer Apr, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron J1800CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | Around 80% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 95% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 664,400 MB/s | vs | 60.6 MB/s | Around 10963.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 25.98 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | More than 6.5x better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date 6 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs E1 6010
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
1,661
E1 6010
1,248
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
964
E1 6010
720
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
E1 6010
664,400 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron J1800
1,028
E1 6010
841
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron J1800
554
E1 6010
483
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | E1 6010 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | None | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon R2 series | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 350 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3L-1333 |
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | E1 6010 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 25.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 8.13W |
Intel Celeron J1800 ![]() | AMD E1 6010 ![]() |
Systems
Looking for a system?
- 9 desktops with the Intel Celeron J1800, starting from $147
- 3 laptops with the AMD E1 6010, starting from $260
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
6010 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
6010 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
6010 vs N2830 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $82 | |
J1800 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
J1800 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $75 | |
J1800 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $107 | |
J1800 vs N3050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||