Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD E1 6010 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1800
 | Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz | | Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz |
| | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
VS
Released April, 2014
AMD E1 6010
- 1.35 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 6010
| | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 664,400 MB/s | | Much better performance per watt 25.98 pt/W |
| | Newer Apr, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron J1800CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | Around 80% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 95% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 664,400 MB/s | vs | 60.6 MB/s | Around 10963.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 25.98 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | More than 6.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date 6 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs E1 6010
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | E1 6010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | None | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon R2 series | |
| GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 350 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | E1 6010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.35 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 25.98 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 8.13W | |
 Intel Celeron J1800  Report a correction |  AMD E1 6010 Report a correction |
Systems
Looking for a system?
- 9 desktops with the Intel Celeron J1800, starting from $147
- 3 laptops with the AMD E1 6010, starting from $260
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 6010 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 6010 vs N2840 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 6010 vs N2830 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $72 | $82 | |
| J1800 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $125 | |
| J1800 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $75 | |
| J1800 vs 1037U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $107 | |
| J1800 vs N3050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
