Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD E1 1200 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1800
 | Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz | | Lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
VS
Released June, 2012
AMD E1 1200
- 1.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 1200
| | Better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 31.57 fps |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron J1800CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 70% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.41 GHz | Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 14.63W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | vs | 2.33 pt/W | More than 70% better performance per watt | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 554 | vs | 368 | More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 4.34 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 15.77 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score | 31.57 fps | vs | -1 fps | More than 3250% better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs E1 1200
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | E1 1200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon™ HD 7310 | |
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | E1 1200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 2.33 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 14.63W | |
 Intel Celeron J1800  Report a correction |  AMD E1 1200 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $150 | ||
| 1200 vs 2100 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $135 | ||
| 1200 vs 2120 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $72 | $82 | |
| J1800 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $125 | |
| J1800 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $75 | |
| J1800 vs 1037U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $107 | |
| J1800 vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| J1800 vs Q6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
