Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+ vs the Intel Celeron J1800.

Features Key features of the Celeron J1800  vs Athlon 64 X2 3000+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1800  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3000+ 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 20W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 17.52 $/year
Typical power consumption 8.13W 16.25W

details

Celeron J1800  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3000+ 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.6 GHz
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus