Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1800

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800
Front view of AMD A4 5100

AMD A4 5100

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.55 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 497 MHz Around 40% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 1.55 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.55 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A4 5100

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5100

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per watt 5.14 pt/W vs 3.97 pt/W Around 30% better performance per watt
Slightly better PassMark score 2,067 vs 1,028 More than 2x better PassMark score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs A4 5100

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron J1800
1,028
A4 5100
2,067

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron J1800
554
A4 5100
621

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron J1800  vs
A4 5100 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 1.55 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz None
Cores Dual core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8330
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 497 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

 Celeron J1800  vs
A4 5100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 1.55 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 1.55 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 1.55 GHz

power consumption
TDP 10W 15W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 5.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 12.19W
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction
AMD A4 5100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss