0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD A4 5100 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1800
![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
VS
Released November, 2013
AMD A4 5100
- 1.55 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD A4 5100
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | More threads 4 | ![]() | Better performance per watt 5.14 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD A4 5100CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2.58 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.55 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 497 MHz | Around 40% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.55 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.55 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 5.14 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | Around 30% better performance per watt | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 2,067 | vs | 1,028 | More than 2x better PassMark score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1800 vs A4 5100
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron J1800
1,028
A4 5100
2,067
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron J1800
554
A4 5100
621
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1800 | vs | A4 5100 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.55 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | None | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon HD 8330 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 497 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
details | Celeron J1800 | vs | A4 5100 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.55 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.55 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | 1.55 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.97 pt/W | 5.14 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W |
Intel Celeron J1800 ![]() | AMD A4 5100 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $107 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Intel Celeron J1800 vs J3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $179 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $94 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||