Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G555

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G555

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 69.1 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron G555  vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G555  vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron G555  vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 95°C

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W
Intel Celeron G555
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus