Intel Celeron G550T vs AMD E 350 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Celeron G550T
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron G550T
 | Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
| | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz | | Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,136 |
VS
Released January, 2011
AMD E 350
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E 350
| | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron G550TCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 492 MHz | More than 30% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,136 | vs | 420 | Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.03 pt/W | vs | 1.5 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,073 | vs | 782 | Around 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 12 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 65 °C | Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.35 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G550T vs E 350
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron G550T | vs | E 350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 12 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 28.21 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.03 pt/W | 1.5 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 30.2W | |
details | Celeron G550T | vs | E 350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 22 | 8 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.35 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.35 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon™ HD 6310 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 492 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
 Intel Celeron G550T  Report a correction |  AMD E 350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 350 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| 350 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | ||
| 350 vs D525 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| 350 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 350 vs 450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | ||
| 350 vs 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 350 vs 1037U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
