Intel Celeron G540T vs G1610T |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron G1610T
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the G1610T
 | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | More number of displays supported 3 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the G540T vs the G1610T. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G540T vs G1610T
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron G540T | vs | G1610T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.16 pt/W | 3.69 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Celeron G540T | vs | G1610T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 21 | 23 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.44 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.1 GHz | 2.44 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 17,066.66 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Celeron G540T  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron G1610T Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $64 | $42 | |
| G2020T vs G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $189 | $42 | |
| E3-1220LV2 vs G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $320 | $42 | |
| E3-1265L v2 vs G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $135 | $42 | |
| 2120 vs G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | ||
| N54L vs G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $311 | $42 | |
| E3-1260L vs G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $42 | |
| J1900 vs G1610T | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
