Intel Celeron G540T vs AMD E2 7110 |
Released June, 2012
Intel Celeron G540T
- 2.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron G540T
 | Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz | | Slightly more l3 cache 2 MB |
| | Higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD E2 7110
- 1.8 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD E2 7110
| | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Newer manufacturing process 28 nm |
| | Lower typical power consumption 12.19W | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly more l3 cache | 2 MB | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 10% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 28.44W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 65 °C | Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Celeron G540T vs E2 7110
clock speed
L2 cache
gpu clock speed
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron G540T | vs | E2 7110 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
details | Celeron G540T | vs | E2 7110 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | None | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 28 nm | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | HD Graphics | Radeon™ R2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 12.19W | |
 Intel Celeron G540T  Report a correction |  AMD E2 7110 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| 7110 vs 4005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7110 vs 5200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| 7110 vs 5005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 7110 vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 7110 vs N3060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 7110 vs 7310 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $161 | ||
| 7110 vs N3700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
