0 Comments
| Intel Celeron G540 vs AMD Opteron 848 |
Released July, 2011
Intel Celeron G540
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron G540
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Newer Jul, 2011 |
VS
Released November, 2003
AMD Opteron 848
- 2.2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 848
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 72.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Jul, 2011 | vs | Nov, 2003 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 3,060 | vs | 958 | Around 3.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,727 | vs | 972 | Around 80% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better performance per watt | 1.96 pt/W | vs | 1.15 pt/W | More than 70% better performance per watt | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G540 vs Opteron 848
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron G540
3,060
Opteron 848
958
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron G540
1,727
Opteron 848
972
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron G540
122,750 MB/s
Opteron 848
123,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron G540 | vs | Opteron 848 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
940 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Celeron G540 | vs | Opteron 848 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
Clock multiplier | 25 | 11 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | 0 - 71°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 89W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.96 pt/W | 1.15 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 72.31W |
Intel Celeron G540 ![]() | AMD Opteron 848 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $46 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron G540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $46 | |
Intel Celeron G1610 vs G540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $46 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron G540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | $46 | |
Intel Celeron G470 vs G540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $46 | |
Intel Celeron 1017U vs G540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $46 | |
Intel Pentium G2020 vs Celeron G540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$68 | $46 | |
Intel Pentium G630 vs Celeron G540 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||