Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G540

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G540

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 1800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 1800+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP-M 1800+ vs the Intel Celeron G540.

Features Key features of the Celeron G540  vs Athlon XP-M 1800+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G540  vs
Athlon XP-M 1800+ 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron G540  vs
Athlon XP-M 1800+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 52.81W N/A
Intel Celeron G540
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP-M 1800+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus