Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G530

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 2,147 vs 1,028 More than 2x better PassMark score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,975 vs 1,482 More than 2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.51 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 69.1 °C vs 65.5 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron G460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G460

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G530 vs G460

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G530
118,250 MB/s
Celeron G460
85,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G530  vs
G460 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.94 pt/W 2.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Celeron G530  vs
G460 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 1.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 18
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 65.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.51 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.51 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 850 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 17,066.66 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron G530
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G460
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus