Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G530

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Higher Maximum operating temperature 69.1 °C vs 67 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jul, 2011 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 7 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron D 320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 320

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.37 GHz vs 2.51 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower typical power consumption 19.91W vs 52.81W 2.7x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron G530  vs D 320 

clock speed

Celeron G530
2.4 GHz
Celeron D 320
1.3 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron G530
2.51 GHz
Celeron D 320
3.37 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron G530
2.4 GHz
Celeron D 320
2.4 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G530  vs
D 320 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
478
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 24.5W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 5.9 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 21.46 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 19.91W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron G530  vs
D 320 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 13
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.51 GHz 3.37 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 2,162.3 562.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.51 GHz 3.37 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 850 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Intel Celeron G530
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 320
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus