Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G470

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 43.06W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 46.43 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 12.77 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1850

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1850

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 2,897 vs 1,306 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 65.5 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Apr, 2013 Release date 10 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G470 vs G1850

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G470
1,967
Celeron G1850
4,446.5

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G470
1,653
Celeron G1850
2,244.5

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G470
105.5 MB/s
Celeron G1850
121.5 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G470  vs
G1850 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.9 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 53W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 12.77 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 46.43 $/year
Performance per watt 1.97 pt/W 2.26 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 43.06W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Celeron G470  vs
G1850 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 1.5 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.5°C Unknown - 72°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron G470
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1850
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus