Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron G465

Front view of Intel Celeron G465
Front view of AMD Opteron 8216

AMD Opteron 8216

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G465

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G465

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 77.19W 2.7x lower typical power consumption
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l3 cache per core
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Aug, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 65.5 °C vs 55 °C Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 8216

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8216

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.88 GHz vs 2.02 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2.01 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron G465  vs Opteron 8216 

clock speed

Celeron G465
1.9 GHz
Opteron 8216
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron G465
0.25 MB
Opteron 8216
2 MB

L3 cache

Celeron G465
1.5 MB
Opteron 8216
1 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron G465
2.02 GHz
Opteron 8216
2.88 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron G465
2.01 GHz
Opteron 8216
2.4 GHz

TDP

Celeron G465
35W
Opteron 8216
95W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron G465  vs
Opteron 8216 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
F

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 35W 95W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 83.22 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 77.19W

details

 Celeron G465  vs
Opteron 8216 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 1.5 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 8
Clock multiplier 19 12
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.5°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.02 GHz 2.88 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.01 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.02 GHz 2.88 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron G465
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 8216
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss