Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD E 450

AMD E 450

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G460

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 85,000 MB/s vs 53,200 MB/s Around 60% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 65% better turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 508 MHz Around 30% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Dec, 2011 vs Aug, 2011 Release date 3 months later
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 65.5 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Slightly better performance per watt 2.98 pt/W vs 2.38 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G460 vs E 450

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G460
1,493
E 450
1,127

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G460
1,293
E 450
642

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G460
85,000 MB/s
E 450
53,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G460
1,482
E 450
1,056

GeekBench

Celeron G460
1,482
E 450
2,017

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron G460
1,028
E 450
770

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G460  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Celeron G460  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 1.5 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 25
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.5°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6320
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.38 pt/W 2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W
Intel Celeron G460
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus