Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron G1840

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron G1840

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1840

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,651 vs 506 More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,053 vs 691 More than 5.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Mar, 2005 Release date over 9 years later
Better performance per watt 2.76 pt/W vs 0.82 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology ML-34

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-34

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 43.06W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 72 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 12.77 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 46.43 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1840 vs Turion 64 technology ML-34

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G1840
160,400 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1840  vs
Turion 64 technology ML-34 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1150
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron G1840  vs
Turion 64 technology ML-34 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 95°C

power consumption

TDP 53W 35W
Annual home energy cost 12.77 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 46.43 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.76 pt/W 0.82 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.06W 28.44W
Intel Celeron G1840
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-34
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus