Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1840

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,651 vs 512 Around 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Sempron 3850

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3850

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 72 °C 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 43.06W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 46.43 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 12.77 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1840 vs Sempron 3850

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron G1840
5.18 mHash/s
Sempron 3850
15.62 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron G1840
8.62 mPixels/s
Sempron 3850
3.92 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron G1840
111.31 fps
Sempron 3850
93.75 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron G1840
0.82 fps
Sempron 3850
0.35 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron G1840
-1 fps
Sempron 3850
6.15 fps

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1840  vs
Sempron 3850 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1150
FS1b
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Celeron G1840  vs
Sempron 3850 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8280
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 450 MHz

power consumption

TDP 53W 25W
Annual home energy cost 12.77 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 46.43 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 2.76 pt/W 3.56 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.06W 20.31W
Intel Celeron G1840
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3850
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus