Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1620T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1620T

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.59 pt/$ vs 1.14 pt/$ More than 2.2x better performance per dollar
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 85% higher GPU clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,088 vs 2,571 Around 60% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,283 vs 952 Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 5% better turbo clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 28.44W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 5.02 pt/W vs 3.11 pt/W More than 60% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1620T vs 1037U

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G1620T
136.6 MB/s
Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1620T  vs
1037U 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 17W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 3.11 pt/W 5.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 13.81W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Celeron G1620T  vs
1037U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 18

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD (Ivy Bridge) Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron G1620T
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus