Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610T

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 90% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Apr, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Better PassMark score 2,322 vs 218 Around 10.8x better PassMark score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Atom Z515

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z515

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 1.14W vs 28.44W 25x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 6.36 pt/W vs 3.69 pt/W More than 70% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 0.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 25x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 1.23 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 25x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1610T vs Atom Z515

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1610T  vs
Atom Z515 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
441

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron G1610T  vs
Atom Z515 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 23 12

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 35W 1.4W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 0.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 1.23 $/year
Performance per watt 3.69 pt/W 6.36 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 1.14W
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z515
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus