Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron G1610T

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,710 vs 798 Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Apr, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark score 2,322 vs 912 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Turion II Neo N40L

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion II Neo N40L

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1610T vs Turion II Neo N40L

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G1610T
119,750 MB/s
Turion II Neo N40L
60,500 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1610T  vs
Turion II Neo N40L 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron G1610T  vs
Turion II Neo N40L 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.44 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz 1.5 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 15W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 3.69 pt/W 3.96 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 12.19W
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a correction
AMD Turion II Neo N40L
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus