Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron G1610T

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Mar, 2005 Release date over 7 years later
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,201 vs 533 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 3.69 pt/W vs 1.61 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Better PassMark score 2,322 vs 426 Around 5.5x better PassMark score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 19.5W vs 28.44W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 5.78 $/year vs 8.43 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.02 $/year vs 30.66 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1610T vs Turion 64 technology MT-32

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1610T  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-32 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron G1610T  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-32 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.44 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz 2.13 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 24W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 5.78 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 21.02 $/year
Performance per watt 3.69 pt/W 1.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 19.5W
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus